TimintTimint
所有模拟器
🏗️

架构审计模拟器

3 分钟完成技术架构审计:6 维度评分、风险矩阵、路线图、按 stack 和架构的专家建议。

100% 免费 Instant🔓 无需注册
📋

项目上下文

类型、阶段和关键性以定制审计

🧱

架构与服务

架构类型和关键服务

📊

Traffic & constraints

The more specific the profile, the more realistic the sizing and cost

Concurrent users at peak500 users

Active sessions at peak time. Not the monthly total.

MAU (Monthly Active Users)50 000 MAU

Used for CDN traffic and DB sizing estimation.

Estimated monthly cost

1 460 €

Cloud infrastructure on AWS + managed services (estimate)

Scale tier : Scale-up

Architecture score

65/100

🔧 加强

Recommended sizing

Web frontends3 × VM medium (4vCPU/8GB)
Backend / app servers3 × VM medium (4vCPU/8GB)
DatabaseTier M — medium (4vCPU/8GB) + 1 replicas
Redis cacheRedis 4 GB
Scaling strategyHybrid
📊

在 Timint 应用中升级到专业版

详细的风险矩阵、按时间线的路线图、定制专家建议和精美 PDF 报告。

✅ 自动优先级排序的风险矩阵

✅ 按上下文定制的专家建议

✅ 精美 PDF 报告 + 个人主页保存

💰

Monthly cost breakdown

On AWS at list prices (no commit discounts)

Web frontends240 €
Backend / app240 €
Database340 €
Cache (Redis)90 €
CDN egress0 €
Queue / message broker0 €
Managed services (auth, search, monitoring, email)50 €
Managed ops (15% of infra, min €500/mo)500 €
Monthly total1 460 €

Indicative pricing. Expect ±20% based on real usage, commitments, support, and negotiated discounts.

Cloud provider comparison

#1OVH
1 051 €
#2Scaleway
1 096 €
#3GCP
1 415 €
#4AWS
1 460 €
#5Azure
1 506 €

Same services, same sizes. AWS/GCP = rich features but expensive. OVH/Scaleway = excellent value in Europe.

💡

Immediate cost optimizations

Concrete savings actionable without architectural rebuild

Reserved Instances 1-year

240 €/mo

1-year commitment on 24/7 VMs (stable production) = ~25% discount. ROI from month 4.

Cloudflare Free CDN

50 €/mo

Cloudflare Free covers most marketing site cases. Migration in < 1h.

Renegotiate managed ops

43 €/mo

Once infra is stable, managed ops can drop from 15% to 10%. Get 2-3 competing quotes.

Cumulative potential savings

333 € / month

Not all combine (reserved + spot partially exclude each other). Count 60–70% of the sum as a realistic target.

🤝

Have professionals execute it

Recommended profiles for your level (Scale-up) — ranked by value-for-money and fit

#1 Best fitCloud / scale-up consulting firm

The structuring partner for the scale-up transition

Rate

€1,500 – €2,500 / day

Mission length

2 to 6 months

When to call : Architecture rebuild, internal platform setup (IDP), monolith → modular or targeted microservices transition, advanced FinOps.

Strengths

  • + Senior multi-disciplinary expertise
  • + Structured delivery capacity
  • + Knowledge transfer along the way

Limits

  • Significant day rate
  • 2-3 week onboarding
  • Risk of report without execution
#2FinOps / Cost Optimization specialist

Pure focus on cloud bill reduction

Rate

€800 – €1,500 / day OR % of savings

Mission length

5-10 day audit then monthly follow-up

When to call : Cloud bill > €3,000/mo and the internal team has no time to optimize. ROI often net within first weeks.

Strengths

  • + Measurable and fast ROI
  • + % of savings model possible
  • + Actionable recommendations

Limits

  • Scope limited to cost
  • No long-term architecture advice
  • Risk of fragility to save €
#3Cloud Provider Pro Services (AWS, GCP, Azure)

Native provider expertise for structuring projects

Rate

€2,000 – €3,500 / day (often in credits)

Mission length

Project-based fixed-fee

When to call : Major cloud migration, compliance certification (SOC2/ISO), reference multi-region architecture.

Strengths

  • + Native platform expertise
  • + Credits often available
  • + Access to product roadmaps

Limits

  • Vendor-biased (of course)
  • Very expensive outside credits
  • Variable availability

Generic profiles for guidance. Get 2-3 concrete proposals before signing — quality gaps inside each category are huge.

📚

Recommended stack for this profileSaaS · Scale-up

Tech stack adapted to project type and scale tier

Frontend

tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.frontend

Backend

tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.backend

Database

tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.database

Cache

tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.cache

Queue / Events

tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.queue

Infrastructure

tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.infra

Why this stack : tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.rationale

📈

Recommended scaling strategyHybrid

How to grow technically without breaking everything

Hybrid scaling: vertical on the DB (which scales horizontally poorly), horizontal on stateless app servers. The strategy of most mature scale-up platforms.

1App servers (frontends + backend) on horizontal scaling with autoscaler
2Database on vertical scaling until reaching the largest available instance
3Once DB limit reached: read replicas to scale reads
4Beyond: sharding by tenant (SaaS) or by business entity (marketplace per seller)
5Mandatory cache to absorb DB pressure (Redis with tag-based invalidation strategy)
6Document clearly when to switch each layer to the next level
🧠

Expert advice tailored to your profile

4 complementary perspectives on your architecture

🛠️

DevOps & Cloud Scale Architect

Capacity planning, IaC automation, continuous delivery, multi-provider cloud optimization

  • Strictly document module boundaries (DDD) — one module does not access another's DB
  • CI/CD per module — integration tests limited to touched modules
  • Prepare service extraction by monitoring module usage (operational cost per feature)
  • Feature flags per module to decouple release and deployment
⚙️

SRE / Platform & Kubernetes Architect

SLO, observability, resilience, error budgets, incident response

  • SLO per business module + global SLO
  • Per-module metrics: how many transactions fail due to module X?
  • Failover test by disabling a non-critical module (feature flag off) — graceful degradation
  • Prepare observable separation of the module worth extracting
🏛️

Solution Architecture / Tech Strategist

Long-term vision, structuring choices, business × tech alignment, governance

  • Multi-tenancy: isolation by tenant_id from the data model or separate DBs for big tenants? Decide early
  • Granular RBAC (roles, permissions, scopes) — underestimated at start, painful to retrofit
  • Immutable audit trail (event sourcing) for future SOC2/ISO 27001 compliance
  • Billing: Stripe Subscriptions vs Recurly vs custom — each has its flexibility trade-off
  • Public API = long-term commitment: explicit versioning, deprecation policy, contractual SLA
🎨

UX/UI Growth & Conversion Director

Tech impact on UX, SEO, conversion, retention

  • Time-to-Value (TTV) < 5 min = 2× higher activation — onboarding product must enforce it
  • Auto sandbox for each new tenant = friction-free trial
  • Fast dashboards (< 1s on aggregations) = daily engagement — else abandonment
  • Product notifications (in-app + email digest) = +20% retention
  • Built-in A/B testing early = data-driven product decisions
📊

Multi-dimension scoring

6 axes scored from your profile

成熟度3.0/5
可扩展性3.0/5
安全3.5/5
可观测性3.0/5
可维护性3.0/5
性能4.0/5
🔗

Share this simulation

Generate a public link to send to your team, client or board

The link will be public. Only the values entered here will be published. No personal data beyond the optional name.

Timint 洞察

一次清晰的架构审计胜过 10 次肤浅的。在这里设计范围,让专家在风险区进行验证,再执行路线图。

Timint Smart Tips

AI
📲

Download the Timint app to save these audits, compare multiple scenarios and generate a styled PDF report.

📱

Timint App: 强大精确的模拟工具,助您做出最佳财务决策。计算、打印、保存 — 完全免费。

Share :

免费金融模拟器 | Timint

强大精确的模拟工具,助您做出最佳财务决策。计算、打印、保存 — 完全免费。

免费试用免费试用免费试用免费试用免费试用

100% 免费 — 无需注册

FAQ

发现我们的其他模拟器

浏览我们完整的免费模拟器集合 — 金融、职业、项目、性能 — 助您做出更精准的决策。

更进一步

Timint 应用内 35+ 模拟器

在 Timint 应用中找到您的所有工具、实时收入计数器以及更多功能。支持 iOS 和 Android。

LivePDF35+Apple WatchAI