TimintTimint
모든 시뮬레이터
🏗️

아키텍처 감사 시뮬레이터

3분 안에 기술 아키텍처 감사: 6차원 스코어링, 리스크 매트릭스, 로드맵, 전문가 조언.

100% 무료 Instant🔓 가입 불필요
📋

프로젝트 컨텍스트

감사를 맞춤화하기 위한 유형, 단계, 중요도

🧱

아키텍처와 서비스

아키텍처 유형과 핵심 서비스

📊

Traffic & constraints

The more specific the profile, the more realistic the sizing and cost

Concurrent users at peak500 users

Active sessions at peak time. Not the monthly total.

MAU (Monthly Active Users)50 000 MAU

Used for CDN traffic and DB sizing estimation.

Estimated monthly cost

1 460 €

Cloud infrastructure on AWS + managed services (estimate)

Scale tier : Scale-up

Architecture score

65/100

🔧 강화

Recommended sizing

Web frontends3 × VM medium (4vCPU/8GB)
Backend / app servers3 × VM medium (4vCPU/8GB)
DatabaseTier M — medium (4vCPU/8GB) + 1 replicas
Redis cacheRedis 4 GB
Scaling strategyHybrid
📊

Timint 앱에서 프로 버전으로

상세한 리스크 매트릭스, 호라이즌별 로드맵, 맞춤형 전문가 조언, 세련된 PDF 보고서.

✅ 자동 우선순위 리스크 매트릭스

✅ 컨텍스트 맞춤형 전문가 조언

✅ 세련된 PDF + 프로필 저장

💰

Monthly cost breakdown

On AWS at list prices (no commit discounts)

Web frontends240 €
Backend / app240 €
Database340 €
Cache (Redis)90 €
CDN egress0 €
Queue / message broker0 €
Managed services (auth, search, monitoring, email)50 €
Managed ops (15% of infra, min €500/mo)500 €
Monthly total1 460 €

Indicative pricing. Expect ±20% based on real usage, commitments, support, and negotiated discounts.

Cloud provider comparison

#1OVH
1 051 €
#2Scaleway
1 096 €
#3GCP
1 415 €
#4AWS
1 460 €
#5Azure
1 506 €

Same services, same sizes. AWS/GCP = rich features but expensive. OVH/Scaleway = excellent value in Europe.

💡

Immediate cost optimizations

Concrete savings actionable without architectural rebuild

Reserved Instances 1-year

240 €/mo

1-year commitment on 24/7 VMs (stable production) = ~25% discount. ROI from month 4.

Cloudflare Free CDN

50 €/mo

Cloudflare Free covers most marketing site cases. Migration in < 1h.

Renegotiate managed ops

43 €/mo

Once infra is stable, managed ops can drop from 15% to 10%. Get 2-3 competing quotes.

Cumulative potential savings

333 € / month

Not all combine (reserved + spot partially exclude each other). Count 60–70% of the sum as a realistic target.

🤝

Have professionals execute it

Recommended profiles for your level (Scale-up) — ranked by value-for-money and fit

#1 Best fitCloud / scale-up consulting firm

The structuring partner for the scale-up transition

Rate

€1,500 – €2,500 / day

Mission length

2 to 6 months

When to call : Architecture rebuild, internal platform setup (IDP), monolith → modular or targeted microservices transition, advanced FinOps.

Strengths

  • + Senior multi-disciplinary expertise
  • + Structured delivery capacity
  • + Knowledge transfer along the way

Limits

  • Significant day rate
  • 2-3 week onboarding
  • Risk of report without execution
#2FinOps / Cost Optimization specialist

Pure focus on cloud bill reduction

Rate

€800 – €1,500 / day OR % of savings

Mission length

5-10 day audit then monthly follow-up

When to call : Cloud bill > €3,000/mo and the internal team has no time to optimize. ROI often net within first weeks.

Strengths

  • + Measurable and fast ROI
  • + % of savings model possible
  • + Actionable recommendations

Limits

  • Scope limited to cost
  • No long-term architecture advice
  • Risk of fragility to save €
#3Cloud Provider Pro Services (AWS, GCP, Azure)

Native provider expertise for structuring projects

Rate

€2,000 – €3,500 / day (often in credits)

Mission length

Project-based fixed-fee

When to call : Major cloud migration, compliance certification (SOC2/ISO), reference multi-region architecture.

Strengths

  • + Native platform expertise
  • + Credits often available
  • + Access to product roadmaps

Limits

  • Vendor-biased (of course)
  • Very expensive outside credits
  • Variable availability

Generic profiles for guidance. Get 2-3 concrete proposals before signing — quality gaps inside each category are huge.

📚

Recommended stack for this profileSaaS · Scale-up

Tech stack adapted to project type and scale tier

Frontend

tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.frontend

Backend

tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.backend

Database

tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.database

Cache

tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.cache

Queue / Events

tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.queue

Infrastructure

tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.infra

Why this stack : tools.simulators.archAudit.recommendedStack.saas.scale.rationale

📈

Recommended scaling strategyHybrid

How to grow technically without breaking everything

Hybrid scaling: vertical on the DB (which scales horizontally poorly), horizontal on stateless app servers. The strategy of most mature scale-up platforms.

1App servers (frontends + backend) on horizontal scaling with autoscaler
2Database on vertical scaling until reaching the largest available instance
3Once DB limit reached: read replicas to scale reads
4Beyond: sharding by tenant (SaaS) or by business entity (marketplace per seller)
5Mandatory cache to absorb DB pressure (Redis with tag-based invalidation strategy)
6Document clearly when to switch each layer to the next level
🧠

Expert advice tailored to your profile

4 complementary perspectives on your architecture

🛠️

DevOps & Cloud Scale Architect

Capacity planning, IaC automation, continuous delivery, multi-provider cloud optimization

  • Strictly document module boundaries (DDD) — one module does not access another's DB
  • CI/CD per module — integration tests limited to touched modules
  • Prepare service extraction by monitoring module usage (operational cost per feature)
  • Feature flags per module to decouple release and deployment
⚙️

SRE / Platform & Kubernetes Architect

SLO, observability, resilience, error budgets, incident response

  • SLO per business module + global SLO
  • Per-module metrics: how many transactions fail due to module X?
  • Failover test by disabling a non-critical module (feature flag off) — graceful degradation
  • Prepare observable separation of the module worth extracting
🏛️

Solution Architecture / Tech Strategist

Long-term vision, structuring choices, business × tech alignment, governance

  • Multi-tenancy: isolation by tenant_id from the data model or separate DBs for big tenants? Decide early
  • Granular RBAC (roles, permissions, scopes) — underestimated at start, painful to retrofit
  • Immutable audit trail (event sourcing) for future SOC2/ISO 27001 compliance
  • Billing: Stripe Subscriptions vs Recurly vs custom — each has its flexibility trade-off
  • Public API = long-term commitment: explicit versioning, deprecation policy, contractual SLA
🎨

UX/UI Growth & Conversion Director

Tech impact on UX, SEO, conversion, retention

  • Time-to-Value (TTV) < 5 min = 2× higher activation — onboarding product must enforce it
  • Auto sandbox for each new tenant = friction-free trial
  • Fast dashboards (< 1s on aggregations) = daily engagement — else abandonment
  • Product notifications (in-app + email digest) = +20% retention
  • Built-in A/B testing early = data-driven product decisions
📊

Multi-dimension scoring

6 axes scored from your profile

성숙도3.0/5
확장성3.0/5
보안3.5/5
Observability3.0/5
유지보수성3.0/5
성능4.0/5
🔗

Share this simulation

Generate a public link to send to your team, client or board

The link will be public. Only the values entered here will be published. No personal data beyond the optional name.

Timint 인사이트

명료한 아키텍처 감사 한 번이 피상적 10번보다 가치 있습니다. 여기서 스코프 잡고, 리스크 영역에 대해 전문가와 검증한 뒤 로드맵 실행.

Timint Smart Tips

AI
📲

Download the Timint app to save these audits, compare multiple scenarios and generate a styled PDF report.

📱

Timint App: 최적의 재무 결정을 위한 강력하고 정확한 시뮬레이션 도구. 계산, 인쇄, 저장 — 무료.

Share :

무료 금융 시뮬레이터 | Timint

최적의 재무 결정을 위한 강력하고 정확한 시뮬레이션 도구. 계산, 인쇄, 저장 — 무료.

무료로 시도무료로 시도무료로 시도무료로 시도무료로 시도

100% 무료 — 가입 불필요

FAQ

다른 시뮬레이터 둘러보기

금융, 커리어, 프로젝트, 성능까지 무료 시뮬레이터의 전체 컬렉션을 살펴보고 더 정확한 결정을 내려보세요.

더 멀리 가기

Timint 앱에서 35+ 시뮬레이터

모든 도구, 실시간 수익 카운터, 그리고 그 이상을 Timint 앱에서 만나보세요. iOS와 Android에서 이용 가능.

LivePDF35+Apple WatchAI